Search for: "Concerned Members v. District Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
The District Court dismissed their claims, and the Seventh Circuit affirmed in relevant part, concluding that the PAs were state employees within the meaning of Abood v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
" LVTA filed a grievance against the School District concerning the School Districts commencing a plenary action* against a teacher formerly employed by the School District. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
In an unsigned, per curiam opinion, the Court granted certiorari in both IRAP v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:47 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm
Supreme Court’s June 20th decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 4:44 am
If the parties submit a new settlement agreement that addresses the district court's concerns, then the court agreed to move the settlement process forward. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
As the districts? [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
In In re Higgs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 9:50 am
The Appeals Court affirmed the district court decision. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Trump’s Speech on Matters of Public Concern Entitled Him to Immunity Trump begins by arguing that the district court misapplied the Supreme Court case Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
The Court emphasized that Caldecott was not concerned that the matter be kept private. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:32 am
The district court stayed Warfaa’s case pending the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
W & J Harlan Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:15 am
The district court granted the motion. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
District Court in Oregon. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:03 am
[Defendant] emphasizes that '[t]he territory to which [its] sales teams are assigned often bears little relation to the team members' place of residence.'" Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:31 am
Camp v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 12:27 pm
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held that class action plaintiffs have the right to discover the identities and contact information of class members. [read post]
