Search for: "Connolly v. Cir*"
Results 161 - 180
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 10:35 am
Summary of Decision issued July 16, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Rolle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
From G.W. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
Soobhan v Bandal, heard 18 to 20 October 2017 (Nicklin J). [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
May 21, 2014); Connolly v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Wynar v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 9:02 pm
In the key school-speech case of Tinker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:27 am
Connolly, 281 Va. 553, 559 (2011)). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
Nevertheless, there may yet be room for arguing that the Magistrates and subsequently the Crown Court breached his Article 10 rights because they should have interpreted the word “menacing”, or perhaps the mens rea requirement, in a more restrictive manner (such an interpretative approach, based on section 3 of the HRA 1998, was used in Connolly v DPP [2008] 1 WLR 276 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) in respect of section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988). [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
Nevertheless, there may yet be room for arguing that the Magistrates and subsequently the Crown Court breached his Article 10 rights because they should have interpreted the word “menacing”, or perhaps the mens rea requirement, in a more restrictive manner (such an interpretative approach, based on section 3 of the HRA 1998, was used in Connolly v DPP [2008] 1 WLR 276 by Dyson LJ (as he then was) in respect of section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 11:07 am
The case is Haart v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
” That principle, as the court notes, comes from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Garcetti v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
On January 17, a Florida appellate court issued its opinion (which is not yet finalized, as of this writing) in Gawker Media, LLC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:34 am
He has 15 Supreme Court arguments under his belt, including Hamdan v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
Less than two blocks from the 23rd street subway stations including the 1, C, E, F and V and also the PATH Train.)$100 Host Committee$25 Guest($20 when you RSVP on Facebook)Host Committee in formation:Liz Abzug * Daniel Albanese * Rob Bannon * Richard D. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case from 2004, National Archives and Records Administration v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
