Search for: "Copper v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
Copper Range RR, 27 N.W.2d 603, 604 (Mich. 1947) Minnesota Daly v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
This proposal represents the most far-reaching and aggressive effort to curb GHG emissions since the EPA was given authority over such emissions by the Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:37 am
Diversity v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am
On this day in history, the Supreme Court ruled, in Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:35 pm
In a decision that recognizes the importance of fostering informal mentorship, the Ontario Superior Court held (in 1623242 Ontario Inc. v Great Lakes Copper Inc., 2014 ONSC 782 (CanLII) ) that a lawyer who provides a general opinion about the state of the law to a colleague without being privy to the specific details of the colleague’s case or the identity of his or her client and is later retained by a client opposed in interest to the colleague’s client is… [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:48 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:09 pm
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
(Opinion by Lazarus).In its December 9, 2013 "Non-precedential" Opinion issued in the case of Jacoby v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
The required coverage extends to:-- the female condom-- the diaphragm-- the sponge-- the cervical cap-- spermacide-- the “combined pill” (with estrogen and progestin)-- the progestin-only “mini-pill”-- the “extended/continuous use” pill-- the patch-- the vaginal ring-- a progestin shot-- Plan B and other levonorgestral-based pills-- ella (a pill with ulipristal acetate)-- the copper IUD-- a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD with progestin-- an… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
In State of Arizona v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:54 am
Background In State of Arizona v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:20 am
Here are the materials in Huron Mountain Club v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
A district court’s punitive damage award in a Title VII sexual harassment case was excessive, given that a jury did not award any compensatory damages and awarded only one dollar in nominal damages, ruled the Ninth Circuit in a 2-1 decision (State of Arizona v Asarco, LLC, October 24, 2013, O’Scannlain, D). [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
Let me weigh that up for a minute….Money v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
State v. [read post]
