Search for: "Cornell v. Cornell" Results 161 - 180 of 2,199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by Maureen Cosgrove
North Carolina [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a court should consider a juvenile's age when determining whether the individual is in custody for purposes of the Miranda warning as set forth in Miranda v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Cornell's Legal Information Institute blog reminds us that the Supreme Court January argument round starts today, and they kindly provide the schedule of cases that will be heard as well as links to the LII analysis of each case: Monday, 12 January: Coeur Alaska v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:04 am
Flores [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] and Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:31 am
Callahan [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the test for whether a government official is entitled to qualified immunity, established by the Court in 2001 in Saucier v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 8:11 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Powell [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the requirements of Miranda v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 1:50 am
Garvey (Cornell Law School) has posted Racism, Unreasonable Belief, and Bernhard Goetz on SSRN. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 4:18 am
Cornell's LII Bulletin has posted the following preview of the oral argument slated to take place in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 6:02 am by Michael Geist
Kim Nayyer is the Edward Cornell Law Librarian, Associate Dean for Library Services, and Professor of the Practice at Cornell Law School. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:03 am by admin
Before the case was argued in the fall, Cornell Law students Thomas Shannon, Andrew Kingsbury, and Tyler Schmitt did an excellent job previewing the case for our Bulletin subscribers here: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/18-956 You can listen to the oral argument and read a brief summary of the decision over at the Oyez Project here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/2020/18-956 And, of course, we have the entire opinion on our site… [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:57 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-3 in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]