Search for: "Creek v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2022, 9:05 pm
A couple of weeks earlier, however, the Supreme Court of the United States, known as SCOTUS, threw a wrench into Regan’s plans by agreeing to hear the case known as Sackett v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:20 am
McGirt received praise throughout the United States from tribal nations and federal Indian Law practitioners for Justice Gorsuch’s strong affirmation of the Muscogee Creek’s sovereignty over its reservation and the honoring of treaties made between the United States and the Muscogee Creek Nation. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
The petitioners also urge the court to weigh the relative public vs. private benefits that would occur as a result of the project as called for in Aspen Creek v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
On September 19, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Casias v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
(Bankruptcy; Tribal Sovereign Immunity)United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:30 am
United of Omaha Life Ins. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
, United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that a trustee is not an agent. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
KAHN CLERK [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 08-10100 ________________________ D. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
United States, as the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
In Papalote Creek II, L.L.C. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 12:01 am
Map of United States Indian Removal, 1830-1835. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:06 pm
And, finally, in 1975, the Court stated in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
In Central Coast Forest Assoc. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Oklahoma; Self Defense) United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
In Solis v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:22 am
Here are the materials in Chickasaw Nation v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
