Search for: "Cross v. North Carolina"
Results 161 - 180
of 704
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2021, 4:10 pm
We hope more cities will join Charlotte, North Carolina, and San Antonio, Texas, in canceling their contracts with ShotSpotter—which is currently deployed in over 100 U.S. cities. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 7:39 am
Court of Appeals (August 17, 2021) appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals recent decision in Peltier v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on July 20, 2021. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
In this episode of the NC DWI Guy, Jake takes us on a tour of recent North Carolina Appellate Decisions that touch on various aspects of DWI cases. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:58 am
Which model does North Carolina follow? [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:05 pm
Allison Smith of Fox 8 News in North Carolina reports that a man fell down and became unconscious, but fortunately, his Apple Watch called for help and he was saved. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm
North Carolina alleged that the plaintiffs—North Carolina abortion providers—lacked a credible threat of prosecution for violating the state’s laws—one of three necessary elements to bring a claim in federal court. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on May 4, 2021. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:01 am
., People v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 12:48 pm
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on March 2, 2021. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:33 pm
In Langer v. 314 North Brand Boulevard LLC, 2021 WL 462728 (C.D. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:50 pm
In November, I was on a panel about COVID and Title IX as part of the annual North American Society for the Sociology of Sport meeting. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on December 31, 2020. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 8:12 am
This is because the use of face masks by testifying witnesses undermines a defendant’s right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment and also may run afoul of a defendant’s right to due process under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (as well as under parallel North Carolina state constitutional requirements). [read post]
