Search for: "DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED."
Results 161 - 180
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 5:39 pm
The military judge at Guantanamo Bay has been moving the case toward a trial. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 3:11 pm
The Supreme Court in Joiner reversed and remanded the case to the 11th Circuit, which then remanded the case back to the district court to address claims that Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:56 pm
” The case is proceeding anew in Circuit Court (Circuit docket 06-1197), and dispute between the government’s and detainees’ lawyers has now resumed, giving the Circuit Court these conflicting options: put the Bismullah case on hold and let detainee habeas cases go first (in District Court), dismiss it but with a chance to refile it later, or reinstate it as a fully binding ruling so that the DTA review process can continue… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
On to the criminal side of the docket. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
If either of the Delaware citizens had been served with the complaint, then the case would not have been removable, because a case is removable "only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
They vote to take the case, or as Supreme Court aficionados say, to “grant cert” (short for the writ of certiorari), which places the case on the Court’s docket. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
We have been tracking the developments (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here) in this case since its inception. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 1:33 pm
(Docket No. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
But, of course, we’re in the middle of a drug-abuse epidemic and our family divisions' CHINS dockets are more than full without being told by the SCOV to do cases over. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
We reverse and remand. * * * "This unusual practice has been permitted in exceptional cases where the party has a privacy right so substantial as to outweigh the customary and constitutionally-embedded presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
” But those concepts underpin a claim that a defendant has been unjustly conferred a benefit “through mistake, fraud, coercion, or request. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
But as soon as the case is assigned a new docket number, defendants file a notice of tag-along with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and the case moves again – this time to whatever district has been assigned the MDL. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:49 am
Certainly, the case is fascinating and shows just how wrong cases can go when procedural, constitutional, and substantive requirements are ignored. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:20 pm
In cases where parties have motioned for remand back to the PTAB (SAS-relief), to date, the Court has obliged. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
Rather, the Texas court remanded the case so that a lower court could consider, in essence, whether Texas will honor the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:05 am
This was one of the longest-pending cases on the Court’s docket and attracted two dozen amicus filings. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
Clinton (docket 10-699). [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:45 pm
Multi-district litigation (“MDL”), the process by which large numbers of smaller lawsuits are consolidated before a single judge for pretrial purposes, without requiring any kind of certification process, has been around since 1968. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:21 am
A-0603-06T1 (September 3, 2009) - Case remanded for evidentiary hearing. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:26 pm
There has been no notice in the Federal Register. [read post]
