Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 161 - 180
of 32,101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm
If the rule in question explicitly restricts activity protected by Section 7, it is automatically unlawful; if it does not, the rule violates Section 8(a)(1) only if: (1) the employees would reasonably construe the rule’s language to prohibit Section 7 activity; (2) the rule was promulgated in response to union activity; or (3) the rule was applied to restrict the exercise of Section 7 rights. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:04 am
Nor does it authorize the president to impose taxes in violation of Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 6:19 am
This is from the Korea - Radionuclides panel report circulated last week: 7.9.5.1 Does Annex C(1)(g) impose a positive obligation? [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 7:24 am
March 2 at 4:51pm connection to the site at 6th Street and Elm Road. (8) The Combined Database Is Queried. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 8:27 am
Ishikawa, col. 1, ll. 13-17;col. 3, ll. 16-25, 32-48; col. 8, ll. 27-29; fig. 1. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
The statute is 8 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:41 am
Matter of X-M-C-, 25 I&N Dec. 322 (BIA 2010) (1) A determination that an alien has filed a frivolous application for asylum, pursuant to section 208(d)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:25 am
articleid=1904758 The post Medical Malpractice Reform Does Not Cut Hospital Costs appeared first on . [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:44 am
"] does not appear within many television dramas. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:37 am
The money will be allocated as follows: 1. $10 billion for renewable energy and electric transmission projects; 2. $8 billion for advanced fossil energy projects;3. $18.5 billion for nuclear power facilities; and4. $2 billion to nuclear facilities for front-end nuclear cycle. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
• Defendants: Cellsight Technologies, Inc.; Does 1-50 Infringement of U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 6:28 am
(Supreme Court 2007, 05-608) The issue, as articulated by Justice Scalia in the majority (8-1) opinion, was as follows: [W]hether Article III's limitation of federal courts' jurisdiction to “Cases” and “Controversies,” reflected in the “actual controversy” requirement of the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U. [...] [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which includes California, issued a ruling on March 9 that the clear and unambiguous language of RESPA Section 8(b) does not reach the practice of overcharging. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:23 am
What does this all mean to you? [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 6:47 am
If the court finds that maintenance is inappropriate, it does not matter how long you were married, there will be no maintenance awarded. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
Triplett, 316 N.C. 1, 8 (1986); State v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:48 pm
See 8 C.C.R. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 5:00 pm
Inheritance tax returns are due and the tax owed 8 months after death. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:20 pm
Marty Lederman says he'd originally thought there were 5: 1. no standing, 1. uphold Prop 8 on the merits, 3. reject Prop 8 in a way that relates only to California, 4. reject Prop 8 in a way that would also require gay marriage in the 8 states that have civil unions for gay couples, and 5. find a constitutional right to same-sex marriage that would apply throughout the country. [read post]
