Search for: "Daubert LLC"
Results 161 - 180
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2013, 1:41 pm
AVM Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:35 am
Rao's opinions in the areas of relevancy and methodology under the standard set forth in Daubert. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm
His company is Crash Data Services, LLC. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 11:21 am
Finally, we will do our annual "Top 10" ACMIE cases, which will be presented by Christopher Robinson (Frost Brown Todd, LLC). [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The insurer sought reconsideration based on the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:27 am
AVM Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 7:43 am
On a Daubert motion, the district court excluded a financial expert's "yardstick" methodology for predicting what CDW's Indianapolis branch would have earned but for the alleged wrongful conduct by the ex-employees. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:35 am
Scott, Jr., of the Philadelphia law office of Bodell Bove, LLC for bringing this case to my attention and providing a copy of the same. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 9:35 am
The Court in Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 9:35 am
The Court in Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm
Evid. 702 2000 advisory commitee’s note; Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593, 113 S.Ct. 2786. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
In other courts, it has been replaced by the Daubert standard, which is not substantially different. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
In other courts, it has been replaced by the Daubert standard, which is not substantially different. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
Pneumo Abex LLC was an automotive friction products asbestos case. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
Pneumo Abex LLC, 2012 WL 1860853, *16 (May 23, 2012 Pa. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
“ The court found this “wholly inconsistent with Daubert and the fundamental premise of Rule 702. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:36 am
Pneumo Abex LLC et al., No. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am
Id. at *7.Daubert requirements do not apply to a determination of the validity of an ediscovery method. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:32 am
Interestingly, Dean Klonoff does think that courts should resolve Daubert questions before certification, because they are about the admissibility of evidence, rather than proof of the merits. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
Drug Impairment Detection Services, LLC, the U.S. [read post]
