Search for: "David G Baker"
Results 161 - 180
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 7:25 am
Wodehouse Art Hinshaw Artnegotiates Arizona State Negotiation Dispute Resolution Zachary Kramer zachary_kramer Arizona State Kris Mayes krismayes Arizona State Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Race & the Law Land Use Brian Gallini profcoachg Arkansas-Fayetteville Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Legal Education Stacy Leeds stacyleeds Arkansas-Fayetteville Property American Indian Law Legal Education Jill Lens… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Wodehouse Art Hinshaw Artnegotiates Arizona State Negotiation Dispute Resolution Zachary Kramer zachary_kramer Arizona State Kris Mayes krismayes Arizona State Steve Clowney steveclowney Arkansas-Fayetteville Property Race & the Law Land Use Stacy Leeds stacyleeds Arkansas-Fayetteville Property American Indian Law Legal Education Jill Lens jillwieberlens Arkansas-Fayetteville Torts Remedies Women & the Law Cynthia Nance Nancecy… [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am
Bondy, Michael G. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Plymouth, MA; James Baker, President) 21 Street, Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 12:49 pm
” Russia may not find many sympathetic Western ears at a G-20 summit, according to Reuters. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
http://bit.ly/MXQ9Ys (Greg Buckles) An eDiscovery Case Law Update - http://bit.ly/PnQbF3 (David Cohen, Caitlin Gifford) Boxes of Backups: Are Backup Tapes Still “Not Reasonably Accessible? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
http://bit.ly/MXQ9Ys (Greg Buckles) An eDiscovery Case Law Update - http://bit.ly/PnQbF3 (David Cohen, Caitlin Gifford) Boxes of Backups: Are Backup Tapes Still “Not Reasonably Accessible? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
http://bit.ly/MXQ9Ys (Greg Buckles) An eDiscovery Case Law Update - http://bit.ly/PnQbF3 (David Cohen, Caitlin Gifford) Boxes of Backups: Are Backup Tapes Still “Not Reasonably Accessible? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:57 am
: Surrogate MotherhoodGeneral Reporter: Françoise Monéger, Paris, FranceChair: Dagmar Coester-Waltjen, Göttingen, Germany(2) Computers (VI.) [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
http://bit.ly/MXQ9Ys (Greg Buckles) An eDiscovery Case Law Update - http://bit.ly/PnQbF3 (David Cohen, Caitlin Gifford) Boxes of Backups: Are Backup Tapes Still “Not Reasonably Accessible? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 4:58 pm
Splinter-Watkins, OT, HPCS** Triadfarms@aol.com Paris, KY David Laframboise, PT Level II d-laframboise@hotmail.com Sedalia, KY 42079 Colleen Ball, PT Level I cball@kort.com Bardstown, KY Rebecca Johnson, OT Level I rlj1@cardinalhill.org Versailles, KY Joanne Luciano, PT** Level I j.luciano@insightbb.com Lexington, KY Louisiana Anna Borne, SLP Level I eaborne@yahoo.co [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Baker, Associate Professor of Law, University of Hawaii at Manoa William S. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
Second, in offering my statement to you, I necessarily tread where others who are far smarter than I have already walked.[1] In particular, I have relied upon two truly magnificent legal analyses of the topic, one by Steve Bradbury, who served in the Office of Legal Counsel during the Bush Administration,[2] and the other by David Kris, who served as Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division during the Obama Administration.[3] In my statement, I want to make four… [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Baker, 61, of Dallas, died August 28, 2020. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
Baker, 61, of Dallas, died August 28, 2020. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
Pennsylvania Baker v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
”), rev’g Beylin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
