Search for: "Davis v. Thomas"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,026
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
In one action last Monday, the Court denied the request for review (known as a petition for a writ of certiorari) in the case filed by the Pennsylvania Republican Party (Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:00 am
Lapsley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Adam Davis, Esquire of Davis & Sarbinoff, LLCDefendant: Gateway Triangle Corp., 7405 Indy Corp., 850 Indy Corp., Northlake Marketing LLC, Thomas M. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court heard argument on Monday by telephone in Pham v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
The Law of Facebook, UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming, Ashutosh Avinash Bhagwat, University of California, Davis – School of Law. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Ward, and Thomas J. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
Harris, University of California, Davis School of Law Rather than silo disability or limit conversations about disability to the antidiscrimination realm, we ought to deploy disability as a critical lens across areas of law. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:13 pm
Davis, 914 F. 3d 383, 390 (CA5 2019) (destruction of religious property); Yang v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
” (Mooppan referred to Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
Saul, 19-1442, and Davis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
The defendants justified under certain patents to Thomas A. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
For example, the Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am
., Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Sam Alito, seized upon the opportunity to present his views on the conflict between religious liberty, a right expressly protected under the First Amendment, and the “right to same-sex marriage,” which he describes as “read into the Fourteenth Amendment” in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:40 pm
Thomas’ statement came in the case of Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:46 pm
Justice Thomas wrote in part:In Obergefell v. [read post]
