Search for: "Denis v. Perry"
Results 161 - 180
of 898
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
Walker basically accepted Ted Olson's strategy to put the pending Proposition 8 lawsuit, Perry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Perry - The Prop 8 Case First, let's look at Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the employee was told that if he did not submit his resignation immediately he would be served with disciplinary charges. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:28 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the defendant’s motion for discovery regarding the plaintiffs’ immigration status in Colon v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 7:20 pm
In the words of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Perry (challenging California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 10:33 am
By Ursula Furi-Perry, J.D. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Some 44 years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the landmark case, Loving v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:11 am
Irresistible impulse as a defense in an administrative disciplinary actionPerry v Comm. of Labor, App. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm
My initial reaction to the Ninth Circuit panel's decision today in Perry v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Perry v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:32 pm
That case, as titled in the US Supreme Court, is Perry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:38 am
See Ellis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 pm
(Dale Carpenter) I’m still studying the decision today in Perry v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:10 am
Perry Equip. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
The Supreme Court is not likely to impose same-sex marriage on the entire country, so Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
Holdings Inc. v Barclays Bank PLC, 151AD3d108, 117 [1st Dept 2017], Iv to appeal denied, 29 NY3d 919 [2017] [internal quotations and citation omitted]). [read post]
