Search for: "Department of Commerce v. United States House of Representatives"
Results 161 - 180
of 334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
In the event that the Department of Commerce does decide to investigate whether CSPV cells and modules should be subject to U.S. anti-dumping laws and countervailing duties, the Department of Commerce will determine and asses whether: The process of assembly or completion in the foreign county is “minor or insignificant”; The value of merchandise produced in the county subject to the antidumping or countervailing duties order is a significant portion… [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Paul followed up his primer by posting a letter signed by several former high-level national security officials to Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in opposition to the Senator’s proposals to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees to the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Assemblyman V. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
Granted patents and the protection of standard setting processes To avoid the potential for anticompetitive extension of market power beyond the scope of granted patents, and to protect standard-setting processes from abuse, the Order encourages the Attorney General and the Secretary of Commerce to consider whether to revise their position on the intersection of the intellectual property and antitrust laws, including by considering whether to revise the Policy Statement on Remedies for… [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
Department of Commerce (10-291). [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:36 am
New York, a case brought by 22 state and 15 local governments challenging the legality of Donald Trump's plan to exclude undocumented immigrants from the population counts that will determine the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
Trade Representative (USTR) and the Department of Defense (DOD) will need to re-negotiate the terms of international agreements; the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may (or may not) be exempted; and – lest it go without saying – everyone will have to update their regulations. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Maryland’s Senate Bill 2 (and the cross-filed House Bill 965) is concerning in its own right, but also as a harbinger of action in other states. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Three cases – Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
For example, former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Sen. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
To put my point in his terms, did the New Deal “take the wrong turn” on the Commerce Clause (and much else besides)? [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
In 2020, the proposal was vetted by the federal interagency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which is comprised of representatives from 16 U.S. departments and agencies, including Treasury, Justice, Commerce, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Bloomberg BNA’s lengthy Survey of State Tax Departments lists hundreds of scenarios in which states conclude nexus has been established by non-physically-present businesses.[15] U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 5:33 am
” In so doing, Roosevelt justified his actions “by virtue of the power and authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States[.] [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
