Search for: "Division 4 Construction, LLC"
Results 161 - 180
of 267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
Construction contract terms need to be unambiguous. 4. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
Construction contract terms need to be unambiguous. 4. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 2013 WL 5532767, at *7-8 (D. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 10:08 am
The lead attorney in Smith Rayl Law Office, LLC’s business law practice is a former chemical engineer and former in-house counsel in Eli Lilly and Company’s law division, where he supported the company’s engineering and construction components, including its construction contracts. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am
In a decision earlier this month by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Thomas F. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
Exhaustion A party cannot maintain an action alleging that the EIR does not comply with the environmental quality division of the Public Resources Code “unless the alleged grounds for noncompliance with this division were presented to the public agency orally or in writing by any person during the public comment period provided by this division or prior to the close of the public hearing on the project before the issuance of the notice of determination. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
In this case, the LLC was owned and entirely controlled by one person, a construction contractor who set up a separate LLC for each of his projects. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:47 am
In this case, the LLC was owned and entirely controlled by one person, a construction contractor who set up a separate LLC for each of his projects. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
By William W. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:06 am
The Supreme Court will decide whether the Inner House (Second Division) made an error in their interpretation of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2006, reg 4(3) and consequently in their decision as to whether the respondent had breached the Regulations. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
LLC. v. [read post]
SOX Whistleblower Protection Extends to Employees of Private Contractors, According to Supreme Court
6 Mar 2014, 2:26 pm
FMR LLC, 571 U.S. ___ (2014). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am
The first is CTNY Investors 3, LLC v DME CRE Opportunity Fund I LP, 2014 NY Slip Op 30268(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 29, 2014], decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 4:53 am
” The Elliotts were resort developers charged with “the construction and management of the Maxim Bungalows project,” and a license agreement to use the Maxim trademark in connection with the Maxim Bungalows. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Anthony Lanza, for having participated in the defense of some litigation cases arising out of the Gauley Bridge tunnel construction. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:32 am
Recently I came across a third, new decision in an LLC merger case more akin to Stulman, in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Melvin L. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:31 am
The firm’s anchor divisions are: Corporate Division, Labor and Employment Law Division and Litigation Division. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
Jerusalem Cafe, LLC Following a jury verdict, in favor of the plaintiff-employees, the defendant-employer appealed. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:56 am
The CLE will discuss a myriad renewable energy law issues relating to agriculture land, including: (1) solar power purchase agreements (e.g., construction risk allocation, production guarantees, lender and financing issues, and common defaults and remedies); (2) solar lease agreements (e.g., easements, alternative land rights, title issues, water rights for concentrated solar power projects); (3) wind lease agreements (e.g., current trends and historical context, stages of wind energy… [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:31 am
Hall Builders; PEELE, operating through P.A.P’s Custom Home Builders, LLC and C and P Custom Homes, LLC; and MALDINI, operating through NY Construction, LLC, unlawfully profited from the sale of properties purchased or developed by the conspirators to individuals who did not have the financial means to purchase the properties, identified in the charging documents as “straw buyers”. [read post]