Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 161 - 180
of 17,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2019, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court reviewed its precedent and the legislative history of Section 145, ruling unanimously that this statute does not permit the Patent & Trademark Office to recoup the salaries of its legal personnel as “expenses” of the proceedings. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:58 am
If the initial set of interrogatories does not exhaust this limit, the balance may be propounded in subsequent sets. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:06 am
Were those Kenmore ovens for 50% off and other Kenmore ranges advertised for 35% off excluded. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
Caldwell, 35 FLW 425, Fla. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:50 am
In practice, an LLP has to submit a partnership tax return but does not pay tax. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
A statutory mandatory minimum sentence does not permit a sentencing judge to fully consider all of the factors normally required for a just sentence under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 9:12 am
This podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:51 am
The issue is whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 7:22 am
But, this case does stand out from the typical case in which claims of a patent were invalidated by a court. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 10:08 am
Upon the revelation of the photograph, the Governor issued a lengthy apology for the content of the page, which was published 35 years ago. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 9:38 am
Importantly, however, the Order does not require construction companies to unionize, it only binds a federal construction contractor’s employees to the terms of a PLA. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:09 am
"A rule that any patent holder that licensed its product could never obtain a preliminary injunction is at odds with the purpose of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 6:37 am
§ 251 does not include the terms “explicit” or “unequivocal. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:35 am
[M]erely being cumulative of other prior art does not invoke § 315(e)(2) estoppel. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:44 am
Laitram Corp, a bare majority of the Supreme Court ruled that exporting three separate boxes of parts that could be assembled abroad into a patented deveining machine in less than an hour was not actionable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:29 pm
Error not harmlessFlores, 35 FLW 2209, 3rd DCA, Six year cap for VOP/VCC does not apply even when new charges are dismissed or nolle prossed - Conviction in the new case need not precede sentencing on theprobation violation as long as the court determining the violation has sufficient evidence that def committed the new offense, 4th DCA language cited in this opinion according to the 3rd DCA is dicta. see Rogers, 972/1017(4th DCA 2008)The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:35 am
Fuld $35 million in restricted stock, putting him on track to earn some $50 million for 2007. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:50 am
Basic biographical information, and Miranda does not apply to a question to obtain basic booking informationHarris, 35 FLW 1007, 1st DCA, Other crimes evidence. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:32 am
” Supplemental App. 35 (capitalization altered). [read post]
