Search for: "Doe Defendants A-Z" Results 161 - 180 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 7:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Jay-Z and the other defendants argued that the United States does not have a comparable moral rights clause and, as such, the plaintiff’s have no standing in U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Therefore, if this Court believes that plaintiff has proved her case on the merits (a matter on which this brief does not opine), this Court should vacate the injunction and remand for the entry of an injunction crafted as described above. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 428 F.2d 812 (6th Cir. 1970)). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 7:15 am by MBettman
 In January 2014, Turner and his wife filed suit against Appellant Union Carbide Corporation and other named defendants not party to the present appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:10 am by MBettman
 In January 2014, Turner and his wife filed suit against Appellant Union Carbide Corporation and other named defendants not party to the present appeal. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 7:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Though Kohler does regularly license the images to authorized retailers, Essential Hardware has no such license. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
      Judge Wilson observed that the appeal presented a straightforward question of statutory interpretation: does FCA article 10-A provide an independent grant of continuing jurisdiction that survives the dismissal of the underlying article 10 neglect petition? [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm by Joel R. Brandes
      Judge Wilson observed that the appeal presented a straightforward question of statutory interpretation: does FCA article 10-A provide an independent grant of continuing jurisdiction that survives the dismissal of the underlying article 10 neglect petition? [read post]
But while Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney is now officially the acting director of the CFPB—at least as of this writing—the story does not end there. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
 Defendant disagrees, and says that California should impose the full requirements (X, Y and Z) to all class actions instead.To be clear:  there's no statute or rule here. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Yet that is precisely what Stanford University’s Mark Z. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On September 8, 2017, in X v Y & Z, the court continued and expanded an interlocutory injunction against anonymised defendants. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by Schachtman
 Campion found a small z-score for the 40+ versus <40 age groups comparison (z =1.51), which is not close to statistical significance at the 5% level. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm by Adam Levitin
 In other words, in a string of transactions from X to Y to Z, if X to Y is non-usurious, but Y to Z is usurious, can X shelter in Y's usury defense? [read post]