Search for: "Doe et al v. University Of The South"
Results 161 - 180
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Labor Party against charges that he had violated the rights of Princeton University by trespassing on its property to pass out leaflets condemning the Trilateral Commission and, more specifically, the campaign led by many left-wing students for Princeton to divest its investments for in South Africa. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:00 pm
Singh et al 2006 BCSC 1545 involves such a case. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Under section 5(e) of the CPA: (e) there is a representative plaintiff or defendant who, (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, (ii) has produced a plan for the proceeding that sets out a workable method of advancing the proceeding on behalf of the class and of notifying class members of the proceeding, and (iii) does not have, on the common issues for the class, an interest in conflict with the interests of other class members. 1992, c. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
City of Long Beach, et al., Xavier Becerra (Attorney General, as Intervener) v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Oxford University historian Peter Bartrip, for one, noted that Selikoff had testified frequently. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
A year-long subscription is $35.99.[9] How does AI create the avatars? [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm
Calling profits normal does not make them normal. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Weems, et al., the two Boston Massacre Trials of Captain Thomas Preston and eight other British redcoats - for the paltry sum of eighteen guineas, future-president-to-be John Adams, then a 34-year old lawyer in Boston, took on the unpopular defense of these almost surely-to-be-hung soldiers. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
It does, however, indicate how investors themselves may also be exposed to claims of a similar nature. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Heller v. [read post]
