Search for: "Doe v. Black et al" Results 161 - 180 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 11:44 am by Olivier Moréteau
Does history reflect a move from diversity to unity or an ongoing conflict between the two? [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
§ 1125(a)) Relief for Unfair Competition Under California Business And Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Blume, et al. argue that there are compelling reasons to read McCleskey narrowly. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
And yet, no where in the ASA’s statement does the group suggest that the the p-value was a “flawed” measure. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm by Florian Mueller
" brief (this post continues below the document): 15-11-02 Google Facebook Et Al. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Judge Bea, dissenting, would have sent the case to a jury on the hypothesized IIC about affiliation between MTM and Luminox et al. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
”[12]            So what does the evidence suggest? [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm by Schachtman
Australia 432 (2002); Cohen SM, O’Connor AM, Hart J, et al. [read post]