Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 161 - 180
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that the Board's denial of Officer's application for ADR benefits was not arbitrary and capricious noting that the relevant date for purposes of disability is at or prior to the applicant's retirement from service, citing Matter of Gullo v Kelly, 50 AD3d 449, leave to appeal denied 11 NY3d 702.The court noted that the Medical Board's consideration of evidence and reports after Officer's retirement, and… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that the Board's denial of Officer's application for ADR benefits was not arbitrary and capricious noting that the relevant date for purposes of disability is at or prior to the applicant's retirement from service, citing Matter of Gullo v Kelly, 50 AD3d 449, leave to appeal denied 11 NY3d 702.The court noted that the Medical Board's consideration of evidence and reports after Officer's retirement, and… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am
What does this mean? [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 8:58 am
What does this mean? [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
NATIONAL MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
"] From Friday's decision in Doe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
He said, “The law does not require that the child have a medical condition. . . . [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
That person now is a highly functioning professional and his mental health symptoms have been resolved by the medication. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm
The plaintiffs assert that not only does this violate the ADA, but also state laws/guidance in those jurisdictions providing that businesses are required to allow individuals who cannot wear masks due to a medical condition to enter the premises, without the need to provide the business with documentation of their inability to wear a mask for medical reasons. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 pm
Indeed, in one of the seminal residency cases, Whittell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
That is the question that John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, examines in the following guest post. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:55 pm
" Hardy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
The Board found that Dr. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
What does it mean? [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Allen v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
The medical examiner's office released Charles's body to McNabb of Redmond Funeral Home on July 28, 2015…. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:00 am
Rytlewski was “familiar with the standards of acceptable professional practice for [decedent’s] heart procedure in the Davidson County area,” and that the “Tennessee Board of Medical Examiners had granted Dr. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
