Search for: "Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc"
Results 161 - 180
of 594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
Childers, 982 So.2d 36 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:13 am
Turning to DSW’s argument that the employee failed to mitigate damages, the court found that she put forth compelling facts tending to show that she conducted a thorough job search from 2009 through 2012, worked at Wal-Mart at a lower paying job for a while, and again conducted a thorough job search after she left Wal-Mart. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
See Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:33 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 572F.3d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Contract interpretation isa question of law that we review de novo. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Armour, Inc., 929 P.2d 340, 347 (Utah 1996); Coffman v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Ryan v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 138 F.3d 1437 (Fed. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 6:04 am
Wal-Mart terminated Mr. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., September 11, 2015). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:50 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:43 am
—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 1:57 pm
Wal-Mart, Inc., filed within the U.S. [read post]
