Search for: "Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm by Charles Casper
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:13 am by Joy Waltemath
Turning to DSW’s argument that the employee failed to mitigate damages, the court found that she put forth compelling facts tending to show that she conducted a thorough job search from 2009 through 2012, worked at Wal-Mart at a lower paying job for a while, and again conducted a thorough job search after she left Wal-Mart. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:33 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 572F.3d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 2009) (“Contract interpretation isa question of law that we review de novo. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 138 F.3d 1437 (Fed. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm by Charles Casper
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]