Search for: "Does, 1-136" Results 161 - 180 of 1,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2014, 5:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Essentially, “direct seller” means a person who: (1) does home sales or sells in locations other than traditional retail establishments; (2) almost all the person’s pay is directly related to sales or other output, not hours worked; and (3) has a written contract with the person for whom services are performed providing that the person will not be treated as an employee for tax services. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm by Frank Heft
§ 922(g)(1)) and was sentenced as an armed career criminal (ACCA) to 222 months imprisonment. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 11:34 am by Derek T. Muller
" It does not give "full weight" in its metrics to jobs that were funded by the law school. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Philip Bobbitt
Constitution would permit state grand juries to preempt the impeachment process by indicting presidents) and historical arguments (which are noted in Black & Bobbitt, “Impeachment: A Handbook,”  see pp. 112, 136). (3) The one argument that Professor Tribe does address is the prudential argument that it is simply impractical to expect a president to handle his responsibilities while defending against a criminal indictment. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 7:54 am by Doorey
” Issues for Discussion Cross-reference to Law of Work text:  Chapter 11 (Termination by Agreement of the Parties) and Chapter 13 (Termination by an Employer with ‘Reasonable Notice’) 1. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is also possible to supplement the facts on condition that the supplementary submissions do not extend beyond the framework of the previous submissions (J 5/94 [2.3]). [10] The appellant argues that in the present case the letters filed before 5 March 2008, the date of expiry of the two-month time limit pursuant to R 136(1), indicate grounds on which the request for reestablishment is based and set out facts on which this request relies. [11] However, the board does not… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Admissibility of the request for re-establishment of rights2.1 According to Rule 136(1) EPC a request for re-establishment of rights under Article 122(1) EPC shall be filed within two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance with the period, which is normally the date on which the person responsible for the application becomes aware of the fact that a time limit has not been observed (cf. [read post]
Shirey, 2020 ME 136 (December 15, 2020), Maine’s Law Court ruled that it does not violate the Maine or U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:25 am by Bill Marler
By January…Read More » Cargill Meat Solutions Ground Turkey 2011 136 sick – The U.S. [read post]