Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
Update [2008-8-20 10:4:28 by Big Tent Democrat]: Battleground Poll has McCain by 1, 47-46. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:26 pm
" Norvil, 41 Fla. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Carlson appealed the Montana District Court's ruling.The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, affirmed the Montana District Court's ruling explaining that: [1] the MMA does not preclude a federal contractor from complying with all the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act (DFWA), 41 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Carlson appealed the Montana District Court's ruling.The United States Circuit Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, affirmed the Montana District Court's ruling explaining that: [1] the MMA does not preclude a federal contractor from complying with all the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act (DFWA), 41 U.S.C. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:49 pm
These four requirements are that the tax is applied to an [1] activity with a substantial nexus with the taxing State, [2] is fairly apportioned, [3] does not discriminate against interstate commerce, and [4] is fairly related to the services provided by the State. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:12 am
Published: 8/6/2015 11:41 AM [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:07 pm
Part 60-1. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:39 am
Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlogger comment: This decision doesn't add much to TTAB jurisprudence, does it? [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:31 pm
See also In re Bath & Kitchen Fixtures Antitrust Litig., 535 F.3d 161, 165 (3d Cir. 2008) (“[A] filing under [FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i)] is a notice, not a motion. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
” ’865 patent 1:41–44. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
Decisions from the 1st DCA (especiall7y 1/2) are more frequently including "closing observations," as does this published opinion today from 1/2 in an appeal by a lawyer against a sanctions order imposed on her:By way of closing observation, we note that [Appellant's] brief provided us virtually no assistance in reaching our decision and fails to meet basic standards governing appellate briefing. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 11:00 pm
Moreno, 401 S.W.3d 41, 44 (Tex. 2013) (citing Palacios, 46 S.W.3d at 879); Certified EMS, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:53 am
” James Pooley, Trade Secrets § 2.02[1] (2010). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:04 pm
Friedel, 714 N.E.2d 1231, 1240-41 (Ind. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 6:10 am
The period of ineligibility is therefore 41 days. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:15 am
Corp., 850F.3d 1332, 1340–41 (Fed. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 11:27 am
McAdory, 935 F.3d 838, 840–41 (9th Cir. 2019)], we applied Valencia-Mendoza to hold that a defendant's convictions under Washington law were not felonies for purposes of § 922(g)(1) . . . . [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 4:13 am
Furthermore, since EUTM 1 does not designate any particular colour, its protection also extends to colour combinations including the combination of red and white. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 3:07 pm
Oral Arg. at 16:41–19:22,http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx? [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 6:15 am
What significance, if any, does the scope of the car leasing business have, and the leasing period? [read post]
