Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 161 - 180 of 4,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  [See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. 40103(a)(1) re: “Sovereignty and the Right of Public Transit – (1) The United States Government has exclusive sovereignty of airspace of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
He does not challenge the rejections of claims 6-14 and 16-33.In re Imes, at *1-2. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision suggests that there are special cases where it does not.Claim 1 of the divisional application refused by the Examining Division (ED) read:1. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:28 am by IP Dragon
IP Dragon's friend Rogier Creemer, of Maastricht University, who is doing field research for his his PhD thesis about copyright, piracy and media control, points us to the provisional radio and tv broadcasting recording remuneration payment rules that will be effective January 1, 2010. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Because of this lack of legal security claim 1 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 1:13 pm
Att’y Gen., Docket Number 13-13069, Decided September 3, 2014; Circuit Court held that nunc pro tunc stand-alone INA § 212(h) waiver does not exist. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (This is applying §43(a)(1)(B) puffery analysis to a §43(a)(1)(A), but given that this should be a §43(a)(1)(B) claim, I’m not too saddened.) [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” J.A.27 (col. 1 ll. 37–43).RecogniCorp invokes Diamond v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” This claim would plainly be Dastar-barred had it been brought under §43(a)(1)(A), and you can’t get around that bar, which is based on concern for avoiding a perpetual copyright/patent, by pleading a violation of §43(a)(1)(B) instead but based on the same operative facts. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:10 am
October 30, 2018 - 1 PM: Topiclear, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 5:51 am
Trust Provision Satisfactory Needs Attention N/A 1 Trust Name Does the trust document identify the formal and abbreviated names of the trust at the beginning of the document? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:42 pm
  In the complaint, trademark lawyers for API lists seven claims: ·         Trademark Counterfeiting Under §§ 32(1)(a) and 34(d) of the Lanham Act ·         Trademark Infringement Under § 31(1) of the Lanham Act ·         False Advertising and Unfair Competition Under § 43(a)(1)(A) of the Lanham Act… [read post]