Search for: "Douglas v. English"
Results 161 - 180
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Douglas dissented in part because the decision was based solely on the views of the parents. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
First, Gitlow v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
Tumblr: NYT v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:31 am
One example, the appellate decision in Rosen v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
The English text of the Treaty cedes sovereignty to the Queen of England; guarantees Māori “the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess,” with the Crown having the exclusive right of preemption with respect to land purchases; and provides Māori with “all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V An accused person shall not be extradited, under the provisions of this Treaty, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause under the laws of the State asking extradition, he is exempt from prosecution or punishment on account of the punishable act for which extradition is asked. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under the stipulations of this convention, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 7:00 am
The latest lesson comes in Yeshiva University v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
Eggers and Davey Smith, two well-respected English authors, who write about methodological issues in epidemiology, warn: “Similarly, unplanned data-driven subgroup analyses are likely to produce spurious results. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
> 10th Cir.o o Refusal to take lessons to improve English did not cause dischargeZokari v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The requested Party shall not be bound to extradite its own nationals, but it shall have the power to extradite them in its discretion. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the countries within the jurisdiction of which the crime or offense was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
