Search for: "ENGLISH v. WILLIAMS"
Results 161 - 180
of 816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
(emphasis added)That decision has been praised far and wide by Canadian and notable foreign scholars, such as William Patry. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
., Serial No. 86321169 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of GOLDENBERRY for "fresh fruits"].May 2, 2017 -2 PM: In re Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC, Serial Nos. 85179591 and 85179618 [refusal to register the mark shown below, in color and in black-and-white, for "restaurant services and restaurant carry-out services," without a disclaimer of LOBSTER].May 4, 2017 -2 PM: Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
” Similarly, a federal district court in Pennsylvania ruled that an arbitration agreement sent to potential members of a class action was misleading where it was full of legal jargon and “totally lacking” in easily understandable English (Williams v Securitas Security Serv, July 13, 2011). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Prior to joining Hunton & Williams, Paul was a policy researcher at a think tank based at the London School of Economics, where he helped to develop a network of policymakers, academics, and lobby groups collaborating in areas involving consumer protection and digital rights. 1See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 52(4).2Id. at Section 57.3Id. at Section 70.4See A v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Prior to joining Hunton & Williams, Paul was a policy researcher at a think tank based at the London School of Economics, where he helped to develop a network of policymakers, academics, and lobby groups collaborating in areas involving consumer protection and digital rights. 1See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 52(4).2Id. at Section 57.3Id. at Section 70.4See A v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008) (upholding criminal punishment for certain speech that was seen as integral to criminal conduct). [4] Idaho Code §§ 18-4801 to 18-4809 (2016); Kan. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
Citing to 1933’s Williams v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Another version of the decision, Rex v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
Lyle previewed the case for this blog, and I added a preview in Plain English; other previews come from Nina Totenberg of NPR, William Mears of CNN, and Richard Wolf of USA Today. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Fox v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Fox v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:28 am
Williams, et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:18 am
The Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm
The main opinion in this case references Troxel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Riley v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
” In Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
