Search for: "Eisenberg v. Eisenberg"
Results 161 - 180
of 280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2012, 1:54 am
The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since he failed to show that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of her legal malpractice cause of action (see Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650, 651; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d 789, 790; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578,… [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:44 am
” After Morrison told Eisenberg to restrict access, Eisenberg had passed this instruction along to the Executive Secretary staff in the White House, but that they must have incorrectly classified it. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 1:05 am
Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Jennifer Eisenberg of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:16 am
Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Jennifer Eisenberg of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:06 am
Contrary to the attorneys' contention, that cause of action was pleaded with sufficient specificity (see CPLR [*3]3016[b]; Pludeman v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 10 NY3d 486, 492; PDK Labs v Krape, 277 AD2d 211), and the attorneys' documentary evidence failed to "resolve[] all factual issues as a matter of law, and conclusively dispose[] of the plaintiff's claim" (Brunot v Eisenberger & Co., 266 AD2d 421, 421; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am
As one footnote, note that the pivotal "research exemption" case of Madey v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
Kahn flagged Judge Cooper’s latest opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:59 am
Malibu Media LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 11:14 am
In Madey v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Draft No. 1 1982) [hereinafter Draft No. 1]. [2] See Melvin Aron Eisenberg, New Modes of Discourse in the Corporate Law Literature, 52 Geo. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
May 19, 2006); Eisenberg v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
" "Here, contrary to the assertion of the law firm, it failed to meet its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Greene v Sager, 78 AD3d 777; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:47 pm
CRAFTWORK, INC. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
The first case, Holder v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
Eisenberg, 397 N.J. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
Estate of Jelke v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
Estate of Jelke v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:10 am
Co. v. [read post]