Search for: "Ex Parte Bell" Results 161 - 180 of 282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
” My favorite part of Falkvinge’s post is where he claimed that we “should look in the nearest lawbook” since “in no book of laws on this entire planet are property laws (where stealing is defined) and copyright monopoly laws defined in the same section. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:30 am by Rumpole
You retain an ex parte expert, ask for some of the blood sample and your expert conducts tests. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:59 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The 83rd Texas Legislature overall had a good session on criminal-justice issues, said Rick Casey at the SA Express News, and in large part Grits would have to agree. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:17 pm
We suspect that in some of these cases, the defendant may have purchased the patent as part of a settlement agreement. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm by Robert A. Epstein
  However, in this case, what really rings a bell of credibility to me is the certification of Ms. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
The flexibility of antitrust law in adapting to new industries and modes of anticompetitive conduct is also a source of frustration, because the ex ante application of the domain’s broad principles to particular business practices is tricky to forecast without highly intensive, fact-specific analysis. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:49 am by Daniel Shaviro
  I note that a tool as powerful as the FTC (which offers 100 percent reimbursement of foreign tax expenses) is bound in practice to be equipped with lots of lots of bells and whistles that limit taxpayers' ability to have fun with it. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:15 pm by Howard Knopf
That’s what Shaw and Telus did vigorously and successfully did in 2004, with Bell and Rogers onside if not quite as actively. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:47 pm by Charles Bieneman
For example, and without limitation, upon information and belief the patents-in-suit are invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. sections 102 and 103 based upon some or all of the prior art cited in the following ex partes and inter partes reexamination proceedings: 90/009,800, 95/001,738, 90/009,882, 95/001,739, 90/009,883, and 95/001,740. [read post]