Search for: "FRANK I. ROUNDS COMPANY" Results 161 - 180 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 7:35 am by William Carleton
The third slide (below) speaks to an SEC request for reactions on whether there should be a transitional rule to allow "former" angels (those who were accredited investors before Dodd-Frank, but aren't accredited today) to continue to participate in follow on rounds of companies in which they are already investors. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Dodd-Frank whistleblower provisions, of course, mark a return to the steps taken in the wake of the last round of major corporate scandals at the start of the last decade. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
However, to date, the FDIC has instituted only two D&O claims as part of the current round of failed banks (refer here and here). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by Guest Blogger
Gather ’round while I recount the legend. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:46 am by Broc Romanek
The latest surveys show that only 25% of public companies conduct individual evaluations. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Capital Market Competitiveness and Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II In both essays, I argue that the evidence shows it was not flaws in corporate governance that contributed to the financial crisis. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Steve Bainbridge
See my article Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II or my post Dodd Frank, Bubble Laws, and Quack Corporate Governance. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:36 am by Steve Bainbridge
My remarks will be based on my recent paper Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 12:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Their findings confirm the arguments I've been making on this blog and in my recent paper Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II, which is also posted to SSRN. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:34 pm by Steve Bainbridge
As I detail in my recent article Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II: A study by Olubunmi Faleye ... finds support for the hypothesis that firms actively weigh the costs and benefits of alternative leadership structures in their unique circumstances and concludes that requiring a one size fits all model separating the CEO and Chairman positions may be counterproductive.[1] Another study by James Brickley, Jeffrey Coles, and Gregg A. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:47 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  The article to which he refers is Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:33 am by Vivian Persand
Joan Hangarter, a chiropractor, operated her own business and had an “own occupation” disability insurance policy with Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (“Paul Revere”). [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:38 pm by Ted Allen
The membership cap should have been 33% or rounded up with a minimum of nominees always being TWO directors,” Shapiro wrote. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"Let's be frank" by Mo Rocca was third on Sonora style hotdog. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
It was odd enough that I thought it should be re-used. [read post]