Search for: "Fashions Four v. Fashion Place Associates"
Results 161 - 180
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
On April 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Visiting Nurse Association of Mid-Ohio v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:38 am
On April 2, the Court will hear argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
See Barrow v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and PLIVA v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Despite having been –Van Halen for nearly thirty years, it seems Ms Van Halen may find herself somewhere between rock n’ roll and a hard place. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am
” For those who don’t want to read the entire statement, here is the short bullet summary: In my statement, I want to make four basic points: First, the reality of data analytics has fundamentally changed. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
FOUR! [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:39 pm
Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
The contrast was evident throughout the morning, and in four particular exchanges—which we highlight below. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
It takes place in an online space where people not only speak, but listen. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm
The High Court recently adopted such an approach in AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB). [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
Schmalfeldt continued to demonstrate that he is closest to his sweaty-palmed Happy Place when he is describing degradation of others: So, it's not anal sex (as a practice) to which these small, frightened men object. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Indeed, the whole point of the story was to show famous scenes featuring Hollywood icons, digitally altered to wear modern fashion styles. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm
The Adidas three stripe trade mark is so notorious, recognisable and distinctive that there is no likelihood that a consumer of the goods concerned would, when confronted with trainers featuring two or four parallel stripes in a decorative fashion, be confused into believing that they are the goods of, or are associated with, the appellants; and4. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:09 pm
The methodologies approved by the First Department in the case of Rodman v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:27 am
Two years ago, in the case of American Electric Power v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
