Search for: "Fashions Four v. Fashion Place Associates"
Results 161 - 180
of 277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
Evans devised a four factor test to clarify this distinction. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Ray v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
And so, following primary elections, the Republican Party nominated in his place Lieutenant Governor Tate Reeves. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
The three cases under review are Perry v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events 26 August:… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
* * * “In Furman v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:09 pm
The methodologies approved by the First Department in the case of Rodman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 8:29 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm
Technology has changed, the height of humans has changed, and fashions have changed. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
– United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Kwikset Corporation v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Chief Justice Roberts allowed the hearing to run 13 minutes longer than the scheduled session, already planned for longer than usual, because the Justices were heavily engaged in questioning four lawyers — two on each side of the question of overruling Austin v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Coakley and Riley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:03 pm
” (Constantin v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
