Search for: "Federal Express Corporation" Results 161 - 180 of 5,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 3:30 pm by ManagingTeam
The settlement agreement is subject to approval of Judge Seibel, a federal court judge in White Plains, New York. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 11:15 am
Hammond, Indiana - Trademark lawyers for Plaintiff Family Express Corporation of Valparaiso, Indiana filed a complaint for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and trademark cancellation in the Northern District of Indiana. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 1:32 am by Kevin LaCroix
More recently, the sharp questions of a prominent federal judge have put a harsh spotlight on the SEC’s practices regarding corporate money penalties. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 10:45 pm
Federal Express Corporation (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1291, 77 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 An independent contractor who was working late at night at a FedEx terminal was severely injured when he was assaulted in a dimly lit parking lot while returning to his car at the end of his shift. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:31 pm by Joshua Lloyd
The views expressed in the Special Commentary section of Massachusetts Laws Governing Business Entities Annotated are those of the author and not the firm. [1] No. 20-2931-BLS1, 2023 WL 2744334 (Mass. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:44 am
Rightly used, preemption means a federal law preempts all contrary state laws where Congress has expressed its intent to totally occupy a specific area of law. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” Other corporate political disclosure proposals focus on whether a company’s political activities align with its expressed corporate values. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:28 pm by John Stigi
Shearson/American Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477 (1989), “provides forceful support for the notion that FFPS do not violate federal policy by narrowing the forum alternatives available under the Securities Act. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
Hat tip to an extended, longtime reader for sending in the following via electronic pony express: “131 Federal Judges Broke the Law by Hearing Cases Where They Had a Financial Interest” — “More than 130 federal judges have violated U.S. law and judicial ethics by overseeing court cases involving companies in which they or their family owned stock. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:27 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
If the Federal Reserve objects to a capital plan, a firm may not make any capital distribution unless expressly authorized by the Federal Reserve….The Federal Reserve did not object to the capital plans of Ally Financial, Inc.; American Express Company; BancWest Corporation; Bank of America Corporation; The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation; BB&T Corporation; BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc.; BMO Financial Corp.;… [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:19 pm by eithurburn@getnicklaw.com
Teva Pharmaceuticals, who agreed to purchase Cephalon for $6.8 billion, did not express concern. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:53 am by Tom Webley
The DOD memo reflects express prohibitions on the use of federal funds peppered throughout the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2014. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:48 pm
They came from a federal statute called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which Toobin never mentions in his article! [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:22 am
We have all seen an increased focus on corporate governance at the federal level over the past year. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, in the updated Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations, prosecutors are directed to factor the extent to which a company enforced effective document and data retention policies to preserve, collect, and disclose documents, data, and communications, including those on third-party messaging applications, regardless of whether such data is kept on corporate or personal devices, in assessing the company’s cooperation during a criminal investigation.[5]… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am by Francis Pileggi
For example, the court explained that the company involved did not comply with required corporate formalities such as minutes of board meetings and that it often conducted corporate business informally, including over email, regarding the issues subject to the Section 220 demand. [read post]
Click here to read more about the new UAE Corporate Law reform. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
CPLR Article 78 expresses a preference that state courts, rather than federal courts, decide a federal litigant’s “state-law statutory-construction” claim Carver v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” North Carolina Office of the Commission of Banks at pages 1-2 “Corporate governance and fiduciary duty expectations are set in state law, and for a federal agency to impose these types of rules on businesses is clearly an infringement on state sovereignty. [read post]