Search for: "First Union v. Steele" Results 161 - 180 of 319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
First, two of the cases cited by the unions — NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp and Amalgamated Utility Workers v Consolidated Edison Co. of New York — involved private employers, so the “right” the court was referring to could not have been constitutional. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 am by Adrian Miedema
Resource Development Trades Council of Newfoundland and Labrador v Long Harbour Employers Association Inc, 2013 CanLII 88826 (NL LA)   [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
McCutcheon v. the Federal Election Commission seeks to eliminate the ceiling on what wealthy individuals can donate to federal candidates, parties, and PACs in a two-year election cycle. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
The author is our beloved Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which yesterday provided guidelines as to which elements can be considered in assessing the very essential nature of a trade mark and its compliance with absolute grounds (Yoshida Metal Industry Co. v Pi-Design AG and others, Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P).In 1999, the Japanese company Yoshida Metal Industry Co. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:23 am by Greg Mersol
United States Steel Corp., Case No. 12-417 (Jan. 27, 2014), addressing donning and doffing claims in the context of a unionized steel mill. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:49 am by Adam Kielich
United States Steel Corp., the Supreme Court addressed, in an unanimous opinion, the issue of whether a collective bargaining agreement covering union workers could exclude the covered workers from pay for certain types of donning and duffing time. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:11 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The employees petitioned the Supreme Court, contending that the decision conflicted with the First Circuit’s holding in Tum v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am by Schachtman
This was the first case in which a cancer of the colon was established as compensable and it is likely that this case will become an historical precedent. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am by Mike Madison
In reverse chronological order, with appellate cases first: Bouchat v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 12:10 pm by Samuel Bagenstos
  A simple question, perhaps, but one the Court is poised to decide in Sandifer v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm by Nassiri Law
Many union contracts stipulate that companies don’t need to pay workers for this time, but those stipulations may be overruled by wage and hour laws. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:00 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On 26 September 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in Salzgitter Mannesmann Handel GmbH v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]