Search for: "Fletcher v. District Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The district court did not certify them for appeal, and the panel declined to do so. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 12:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:01 am
Judge Hurwitz doesn't agree, and Judge Christen authors a separate concurrence, joined by Chief Judge Thomas, that expressly says that politics aren't what motivated either the district court's view or the Ninth Circuit's. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:32 pm
After Johnson, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated the decision, and remanded in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:34 am
In anticipation of the briefing of Dollar General v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm
Judge Fletcher explains why.United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:14 am
Unless stayed by the Supreme Court, the recently-decided Whole Women's Health v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 3:09 pm
Fletcher, concurring). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:02 pm
Hornbuckle, Nos. 12-10541, 12-10615 (Christen with Fletcher and Davis (CA4)) --- The court affirmed the sentences of two sisters who pleaded guilty to child sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
Fletcher v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
Barry Bonds wins again.He lost in the district court, which was fine with his conviction after a jury trial for obstruction of justice. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
Fletcher, in Baca v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 9:55 pm
And the court said, sure. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:43 pm
Adams, involves a clear violation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Napue [v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:54 am
Fletcher v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:01 am
Fletcher v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Fletcher’s testimony under Daubert v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:58 am
The district court dismissed the complaint against Amgen on the ground that it was not a fiduciary and dismissed the claims against the other defendants under the “presumption of prudence” standard discussed by the Ninth Circuit in Quan v Computer Sciences Corp. [read post]
