Search for: "General Products Corp"
Results 161 - 180
of 6,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 7:15 am
"[Defendant] alleges the [patent-in-suit] is directed to an abstract idea -- using a computer to generate a quote for a financial product-- and is thus non-patentable subject matter. . . . [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 6:28 am
Unitil Service Corp. and issued from the First Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Due in large part to the growing cost of health care, in 1984, Congress passed the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act, commonly referred to as the Hatch-Waxman Act, which was instrumental in bringing generic drugs into mainstream production. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
A $538.6 million settlement is set to be paid out by Samsung Electronics, Sharp Corp., and five other makers of liquid crystal display panels in order to settle anti-trust claims by indirect purchasers of the products. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
Case citation: eTrailer Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:04 pm
"Relying on General Electro Music Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
AU Optronics Corp., No. 12-1036 (see oral argument transcript; SCOTUSblog page). [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 11:24 am
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437, 441 (2007) (“It is the general rule under United States patent law that no infringementoccurs when a patented product is made and sold inanother country. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
To the extent that intra-agency materials contain "instructions to staff that affect the public," they remain subject to disclosure pursuant to FOIL (Public Officers Law § 87[2][g]; see Matter of Gedan v Town of Mamaroneck [N.Y.], 170 AD3d 833, 834-835; see generally Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, 133). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:57 pm
” Alice Corp., slip op. at 1. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:08 pm
Lombard General Insurance Co. (2006), 266 D.L.R. (4th) 182 (Ont. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:19 am
IDT Corp., No. 2:07-cv-420-CE, 2011 WL 108725, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 1:51 pm
Target's Valentine's Day "Message Bears" are being recalled due to lead (Source: KTLA.com) California’s Attorney General Jerry Brown has outlined a letter that the “Message Bears” had levels of lead that violated federal law, prompting Target Corp. to recall all of the Valentine’s Day gifts which could cause serious personal injuries. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:59 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:27 am
Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586 (1986)NfoSnap did offer some evidence in an effort to show that SNAPCHAT as a whole is generic: dictionary definitions and online references. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 1:12 am
Because of the potential for engine fires, General Motors Corp. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:25 am
Corp., 29 F.3d 165 (4th Cir. 1994). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 1:40 am
Prasco, which makes a generic benzoyl peroxide cleansing product OSCIONââ [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:28 pm
Cir. 2024)Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
