Search for: "Given et al v. Love" Results 161 - 180 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
The words “family violence”, “domestic violence”, “intimate partner violence” and “coercive control” do not appear anywhere in the Federation of Law Societies of Canada Model Code of Professional Conduct. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
Shout outs to the folks from Thomson Reuters, Dorsey & Whitney, Merrill, Kroll, Socha/Gelbmann, Jersey Girl, Laverne & Linda, et al! [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:15 am
Strong et al., McCormick on Evidence § 337 at 415, § 343 at 437-38 (5th ed. 1999); C. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Given Selikoff’s reputation and prestige in the field of asbestos health effects, and his role in helping pass the Williams-Steiger Act of 1969, we might wonder why no one has written a full-length biography. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm by Simon Lester
This is extremely well done because, given that polluter-cost-avoidance (PCA) makes for the key outcome, characteristic, and arguably objective of the authors, it is entirely obscure at the outset and artistically weaved into the d [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dan Kahan et al.: SCt said no reasonable jury could find other than that the police officers in this high speed chase acted reasonably, but Kahan found significant variation in evaluations of reasonableness based on salient demographics. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:53 am
Cosburn, Griffiths & Brandham Insurance Brokers Limited et. al., The Honourable Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
as “…a depraved evil sociopathic neocon…beast pretending he loves his clients merely to get into their wallets. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am by centerforartlaw
They then swiftly abandon the project once the prices hit a high ceiling and transfer the funds to their various digital wallets.[5] Those who invested in the project are not given anything they were promised and “ghosted” by the developers. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  Once caught, he is given the choice of castration or amputation of his foot. [read post]