Search for: "Givens v. Rose" Results 161 - 180 of 1,032
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 4:20 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Previously we noted, here and here, the First Circuit case of Kosilek v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
On a motion for summary judgment, this Court's role is limited to finding triable issues, not deciding factual questions that depend on the memory and credibility of witnesses (Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259). [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by Jack Goldsmith
 Given our visibility, we know they're serious people, bent on destruction. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
As Rose LJ observed in the Court of Appeal, a bridge-like structure for carrying water is what “immediately comes to mind”, an observation that reflects that common meaning. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Charon QC
  Perversity in this may be a blessing, given our climate. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 6:16 pm
Recently, the Appellate Division in the unpublished decision of A.V. v. [read post]