Search for: "Grant et al v. The New York Times Company et al"
Results 161 - 180
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
The 21 websites in subject of this order make it something - how to say - gigantic. * These Shoes are Made for Freely Walking: Copyright Protection & Free Movement of Goods Marie-Andrée returns on the topic of copyright protection of shoes, this time reporting on a French Supreme Court’s decision in a proceedings having as parties the Italian luxury company Tod’s and a French company that imported alleged infringing flip-flops to France… [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, et al. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
New York: Picador Palgrove Macmillan, 2007). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Government is not a party to this defamation lawsuit—Victor Restis et al. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Griesa from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in TPG Arrow Productions, Ltd v The Weinstein Company L.L.C. et al, 1:13-cv-05488. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
They also love celebrities, soaps operas, staying positive and free speech, which is why Simone Kelly-Brown and OWN Your Power Communications, Inc v Oprah Winfrey et al, No. 12-1207-cv is such a tasty compendium of American tastes and obsessions, with a bit of trade mark law thrown in for good measure. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
The Delaware Supreme Court[1] and federal courts in Florida,[2] New York,[3] Illinois[4] and Georgia[5] have made the BJR available to officers. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
In light of these various issues and complexities, the companies and investors who are not as concerned with trying to squeeze the best rate out of the banks seek to use a benchmark rate. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Jonathan Samet, et al., Institute of Medicine, Asbestos: Selected Health Effects (2006). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
I know, for some business reasons it was advisable to split the company, there was (and is) a lot of goodwill in the mark, not granting a license would have significantly impaired the success of the new business, they couldn’t put too many restrictions on the new company’s use of the mark or it would reduce the value of the new company, and on and on. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:07 am
Nankivell A New York case, Ardis Health, LLC et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Viacom Intl., et. al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
The casebook (Ginsburg et al.) is hanging on by its fingernails to the pre-eBay world in which likely success routinely translated to irreparable injury for purposes of preliminary injunctive relief. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
City of New York, et al. [read post]
