Search for: "Gray v. District Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 964
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2019, 1:39 am
Jones 13th floor 269th 176th Judge Nikita V. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:11 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the postconviction DNA testing case of Skinner v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision by "summary order". [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 6:03 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York in Edwards v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
Enter Truc Do, judge for the Court of Appeals, Fourth District, in California. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Doe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:30 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
(You'll also notice that the district court number in the caption begins with "04". [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:59 am
Similar issue was just decided last month by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky in Gray v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:00 am
The latest loss came on June 17, when the Eleventh Circuit in consolidated cases Gray Financial Group Inc. et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
LEXIS 83982 (ED WI, June 29, 2015), a Wisconsin federal district court refused to allow a Block Muslim inmate to add a RLUIPA claim to his complaint because plaintiff only seeks damages that are unavailable under RLUIPA.In Gray v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
The question presented in this case is: Whether failure-to-train liability may be imposed on a district attorney’s office for a prosecutor’s deliberate violation of Brady v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
Yesterday the Court issued a summary decision in Mullenix v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
Not only is this hardly a solution, but to suggest this red herring in the gray area of conflicted intent is to distract attention from the root problem of immunity as reflected in the nightmarish Supreme Court decision in Connick v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:42 am
Tuesday, a petition for writ of mandamus was filed by a false marking defendant who asks the Federal Circuit to consider the following issue: "Did the district court clearly err when it denied [defendant's] motion to dismiss Relator's false patent marking case for failure to plead supporting factual allegation sufficient to infer an intent to deceive under this Court's precedent in Pequignot v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
The huge gray market industry, disappointed with the Supreme Court’s 4-4 split in Costco v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 4:59 am
Grays Hill Baptist Church v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
"Gray v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
In Gray v. [read post]
