Search for: "Green v. Service Corporation International"
Results 161 - 180
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Green, in Scotland and Sweet & Maxwell Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Other methods of cross-border data transfer include the SCC or establishing Binding Corporate Rules (Art. 47 GDPR). [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm
Green, Director of Business Development & Marketing, Baker & Daniels Shari Harley, Owner, The Harley Group International M. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:12 pm
In Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
There is no dispute that Lindquist personally bought the phone, pays for its monthly service, and sometimes uses it in the course of his job.Nissen v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
The Brinkmann Corporation (TTABlog) Fraud is really hard to prove – TTAB decision in Slaska Wytwornia Wodek Gatunkowtch “Polmos” SA v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com)… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Boston Scientific Corporation, et. al. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Service Corporation International and Sci Texas Funeral Services, Inc., d/b/a Mont Meta Memorial Park v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
In Burton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
(Patently-O) CAFC decides inter partes patent reexamination in favor of patentee: Vanguard Identification Systems Inc., v Bank of America Corporation (Docket Report) CAFC: ‘The specification is the heart of the patent’: Arlington Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(ipeg) Rights-holders’ anti-counterfeiting trade pact could have broad reach (IP Watch) Australia News from IP Australia – Discontinuing of provision of National Examination Services to Singapore (Patentology) Does Australia need its own Bayh-Dole style legislation? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to… [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
Privacy International has published its response to the UK Government consultation’s on Technical Capabilities Notices. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 pm
Mary Abraham, NYC, corporate lawyer and KM blogger, (@VMaryAbraham) Tom Mighell, Texas, attorney and blogger, (@TomMighell)Threemoons, Astoria, NY, (@Threemoons)Matt Homann, St. [read post]
