Search for: "HAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 161 - 180 of 2,558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am by Haley Proctor
Biden, the Court upheld Roger Severino’s removal from the Council that supervises the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:49 am by SHG
Nebraska, then-House speaker Nancy Pelosi said: People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:03 am by Amy Howe
On the one hand, Kavanaugh’s opinion took pains to emphasize that the standing question in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Normally, the Department of Justice sues on behalf of the United States but there are many policy reasons why Congress (and state governments) at times allow non-government parties to bring such suits. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:00 pm by Josh Blackman
"] On June 5, a Fifth Circuit panel (Smith, Higginson, and Willett) heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:16 am by jonathanturley
For roughly 30% on both ends of the political spectrum, any inquiry into these charges will begin and end at the caption: “United States v. [read post]