Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 161 - 180 of 5,717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
Now lamenting the consequences, he told the interviewer: “The situation was very bad. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:08 am by Frank Cranmer
The protection afforded to clergy office-holders by EU Directives was provided by s.49 of that Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:21 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Specifically, the Court explained, because “[t]he Pregnancy Warning Regulation simply does not speak to whether a further warning related to a drug’s use during pregnancy can be added to the general Pregnancy Warning on a drug label, whether added by the FDA or added by a manufacturer,” the ”regulation does not, therefore, preempt state law . . . . [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am by Frank Cranmer
He was not an “employee” for the purposes of bringing a complaint of disability discrimination under section 39 of the Equality Act 2010, but he could pursue his complaints under section 49 as the holder of a personal office. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 8:28 am by Joshua Lloyd
He is AV rated by Martindale-Hubbell, his biography appears in Who’s Who in American Law and he has been for years listed in Best Lawyers in America and New York Super Lawyers. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
He has not ever intimated, until today, that he was not prepared to accept the cheque or that he was not going to cash the cheque. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
And he did so because he found the consequences intolerable (every official act by the thousands of Southern government officials who participated in the rebellion would be called into question). [read post]