Search for: "Hill v. District of Columbia" Results 161 - 180 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
REPUBLICAN MULVANEY MONKEY-WRENCH GAMBIT MOVES TO DC COURT Below is the text of the complaint and request for instanter restraining order (TRO) filed by one of the  dueling directors against the other [conversion from pdf]Original in pdf may be viewed here  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEANDRA ENGLISH, Deputy Director and Acting Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street, NW,… [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 5:06 am by Bob Bauer
District Court for the District of Columbia held that senior White House aides do not enjoy absolute immunity from congressional subpoenas for testimony, the reporting on the implications was a bit excitable. [read post]
10 May 2017, 8:01 am by Eric Yap
 Faced with the male Justices’ insensitivities during oral argument in Safford Unified School District v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
‘Steep hill to climb’ In a landmark First Amendment case almost 60 years ago, New York Times v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia (07-141) (filings available here) - the Court evaded a question over the most basic of constitutional provisions: the bicameralism requirement. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Well, the Obama Administration had opposed its inclusion in the revised legislation - a battle it evidently did not win on the Hill. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
Wiser still would've been a decision on Capitol Hill not to include the provision at all. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Although we recognize the loyalty, contributions, and sacrifices of those who are in common citizens of Puerto Rico and the United States, much the same could have been said about the citizens of the District of Columbia, who were voteless over a much longer period. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Bruen, the Court may consider whether to elaborate on its statement in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 567 A.2d 398, 400-01 (Del. 1989).District of Columbia: Mampe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an injunction against the NSA's bulk metadata collection program in Klayman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In Eldridge v British Columbia, the Court found that the failure of hospitals to provide sign-language services for hearing-impaired patients was a violation of section 15. [read post]