Search for: "Hoffmann v. Hoffmann"
Results 161 - 180
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
We know from Guenther v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 2:52 pm
(By the way, I have no compensation for my time to disclose in this context.)In my (relatively short) address I mentioned that one of the intriguing aspects of this spat was the diversity of the patents-in-suit: pretty much everything patentable in the mobile devices industry from A as in "antenna" to U as in "USB" -- only to be reminded that V as in "VP8" (Google's video codec) had also been at issue.For the sake of a complete record of who was involved with this massive effort I'm now… [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 10:25 pm
For what I know, he will be joined at tomorrow's IPCom v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:00 pm
Lord Hoffmann found “no value” in the Committee’s position (para. 57). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:22 am
Once upon a time there was the Newspaper Licensing Agency, a relatively stuffy and generally unloved body that was seen by many users of copyright-protected materials as an infernal nuisance and as a meddlesome, bungling litigant, as in the notorious case of Newspaper Licensing Agency Limited v Marks and Spencer Plc, resolved by a powerful speech of Lord Hoffmann in the House of Lords back in 2001 [this case is worth reading for the facts alone: here is a 21st century ruling on use… [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:05 pm
To be precise, seven decisions of Areios Pagos have applied the findings of the ECJ in the case FBTO Schadeverzekeringen NV v Jack Odenbreit. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
There will always be a penumbral area where views may reasonably differ, said Lord Hoffman and Dame Arden.In his opinion in Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited, Lord Hoffmann said that, although the requirement that the initial computation must give a true and fair view involves the application of a legal standard, the courts are guided as to its content by the expert opinions of accountants as to what the best current accounting… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Hoffmann, Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration Charles T. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 11:47 am
In Tamas v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
Hoffmann - La Roche Inc., 541 F.3d 1115, 1122 (Fed. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:08 am
Customary international law before Austrian courts has been analyzed and established in strikingly contrasting ways over the years: While the in-depth discussion of foreign and domestic judicial practice that the seminal Austrian Supreme Court case of Hoffmann v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 9:42 pm
More pithily, Lord Hoffmann noted in Merrell Dow [1996] RPR 76 noted that “An invention is a piece of information. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:56 pm
Also: strong case management control of evidence essential part of it particular responsibility re experts support for 1st instance judges – robust but fair Hoffmann in Piglowska v Piglowski re exercise of discretion. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
"The difference in the two theories", held Lord Hoffmann, " is that an implied licence may be excluded by express contrary agreement or made subject to conditions while the exhaustion doctrine leaves no patent rights to be enforced." [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:22 am
The subject of Norman's guest post here is the recent US decision in CLS Bank Int’l v Alice Corp 2011-1301 (Fed Cir 2013) en banc aff’g 768 F Supp 2d 221 (D.D.C. 2011). [read post]
6 May 2013, 2:23 pm
(citing Kendall v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Lord Hoffmann on the IPKat here An American Rhapsody here Bohemian Rhapsody here and, if you admire Liverpool FC, here Bohemian Rhapsody sung by cats here Swedish Rhapsody here (earworm warning) [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 3:17 am
Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:31 am
However, the case is certain to prove to be a key FLSA precedent, the first since the Supreme Court’s 1989 ruling in Hoffmann-LaRoche v. [read post]
