Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF HARVEY" Results 161 - 180 of 247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Broc Romanek
This doctrine is fundamentally different if the matter is not a “specific” question or issue, but rather a matter of general applicability, such as a rule-making. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Citizenship and residency requirements In Andrews, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the requirement that applicants to British Columbia’s legal profession be Canadian citizens. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The December 17, 2014 Opinion            On December 17, 2014, in an opinion written by Judge Harvey Schlesinger (a federal district court judge sitting by designation) for a three-judge panel, the Eleventh Circuit reversed Judge Story’s ruling, holding that the question of the applicability of the Insured v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
It was a communication of the kind which savvy applicants and their advisors are all too aware, but which are targeted at smaller and less experienced applicants who may only have one or a few IP rights. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Nov. 10, 2014), Judge Nealon reviewed cases from within and without Pennsylvania to formulate even-handed jury instructions informing the jury as to the involvement of the insurance company in the matter, explaining the absence of the tortfeasor driver in the context of this matter, and emphasizing that the jury’s focus should be upon an evaluation of the claims presented as opposed to the type of parties involved. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Nov. 10, 2014), Judge Nealon reviewed cases from within and without Pennsylvania to formulate even-handed jury instructions informing the jury as to the involvement of the insurance company in the matter, explaining the absence of the tortfeasor driver in the context of this matter, and emphasizing that the jury’s focus should be upon an evaluation of the claims presented as opposed to the type of parties involved. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:28 am
 Finally, Julia mentioned some of the Court of Justice jurisprudence on GI protection, including the controversial FETA affair [on which see Katposts here and here] and the BAVARIA case [see Katnote here] in which an earlier-registered trade mark appears to have survived a powerful attack from Bavarian beer producers.Peter Harvey (Harvey Siskind LLP) spoke next, explaining the position in the United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 9:00 pm by Cody Poplin
Applicants should have an interest in national security matters and possess excellent writing skills. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:55 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison “reemphasized the presumption against extraterritoriality,” and reestablished “the traditional understanding that Congress ordinarily legislates with respect to domestic, not foreign, matters,” consistent with principles that would “avoid the interference with foreign regulation that the extraterritorial application of U.S. law would produce. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
The following media law matters are before the Court of Appeal this term: Contostavlos v Newsgroup Newspapers, Permission to Appeal, 12 November 2014. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:35 pm by Jon Gelman
It is not yet clear how far the hackers penetrated the agency’s systems, in which applicants for security clearances list their foreign contacts, previous jobs and personal information like past drug use.In response to questions about the matter, a senior Department of Homeland Security official confirmed that the attack had occurred but said that “at this time,”... [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Eagle, Esquire, Sean Brennecke, Esquire, KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Defendants Hagai Tal and Irit Segal Itshayek.STRINE, Chancellor. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 3:37 am
If the State does not provide the proper materials, it is possible by way of a motion that the matter can be dismissed . [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 3:01 am by emagraken
Justice Harvey held that normally such an order was appropriate but because of the Defendant’s expert witness’ evidence at trial which crossed into advocacy and further due to the Defendant lawyer’s conduct in the course of a mid-trial application, the Defendant should be stripped of their post offer costs. [read post]