Search for: "INTEREST OF R.R."
Results 161 - 180
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
R.R. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
. : Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010.ChildrenKF479 .B65 2010Children and the law : the competing rights, privileges, and interest of children, parents, and the state : a reader / Joan Catherine Bohl, Christine Metteer Lorillard.Bohl, Joan Catherine.Lake Mary, FL : Vandeplas, 2010.ChildrenKF4155 .R43 2009Courts and kids : pursuing educational equity through the state courts / Michael Rebell.Rebell, Michael A.Chicago ; London : University of Chicago Press, 2009.ChinaDS735 .B3 2010 DVDThe fall… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:54 am
KCCI-Channel 8 reports on a $231,000 libel verdict out of Woodbury County. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
This form was particularly interesting for two reasons. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
For nearly a century, Congress has required broadcasters to identify the sponsors or providers of broadcast programming airing on their stations.[1] Implicitly such identifications should be truthful and non-deceptive. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
In Joiner, the high Court rejected WOE, over the dissent of a single justice,[5] but some of the inferior federal courts have embraced the dissent to the exclusion of the majority’s clear holding, as well as the incorporation of that holding into the revised Rule 702.[6] An interesting case of judicial disregard. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
Declining to impose a requirement that the lessor of mineral interests go back and double-check the Railroad Commission records and compare more recent filings against earlier filings to protect the lessor's rights under the "reasonable diligence" standard, the Court reversed the court of appeals' determination that the claim was time-barred, and remanded to the lower appellate court for consideration of other issues that the court had not reached. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Importantly, the Terms: (1) purport to bind any entity that has an ownership interest in the goods; and (2) include a forum selection provision selecting the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
“Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know” Alan Ackerman, Esq. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
CAPITAL CASEEXECUTION DATEIN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESJAMES CALLAHAN,Petitioner,RICHARD ALLEN, et al. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
A plaintiff who is only interested in a single on-line service may not have standing to complain about accessibility issues for parts of the website he would never use. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
The Copyright Office has published a draft of its next Compendium of U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:25 pm
One purpose of this dinner was to discuss Kimberly's interest in how one became a United States magistrate judge. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
If we can proceed until we are left with the disjunct of interest, we may actually have succeeded in identifying a cause in fact of the particular case. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Saint-Gobain makes an interesting argument, not illogical, (and ably articulated by the dissent) regarding a correspondence between the nonobviousness of an accused product, as shown by its separate patentability, and its infringement of another patent under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
