Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
”The simple fact of the matter is that, while a drug (or device) company supposedly might be able to fool some of the medical community some of the time, it’s simply not possible to fool all of the medical community all of the time. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Complaint lacking identification of infringing act or direct infringer failed to state a claim: Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v Softlayer Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – ITC institutes investigation regarding certain personal data and mobile communications devices based on compliant by… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm by Nathan Sheard
United States, which held that “the Government must generally obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before acquiring” location records. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
First, defamation lawsuits can be triggered by mis-identification. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
First, defamation lawsuits can be triggered by mis-identification. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
First, defamation lawsuits can be triggered by mis-identification. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
First, defamation lawsuits can be triggered by mis-identification. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
He assured them that the material was going to an overseas market where no one from the United States would view it. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm by Florian Mueller
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:48 am by war
Myall Australia Pty Ltd v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2011] APO 48 (link to be provided when available) Lid dip: Patentology [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Steve Sady
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 Nothing in this Ordinance shall prohibit an entity authorized by state law to dispense Medical Marijuana from making deliveries of Medical Marijuana to the residence or business of an authorized individual or health care facility as permitted by relevant state law, subject to the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Demisse Habteselasie
The United States needs a constitutional amendment. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]