Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v." Results 161 - 180 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 4:21 am by Marie Louise
: In re KCK International, In re Filini Wine Company, In re CSI Collision Specialist, In re Boyer Refrigeration, Heating & A/C. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
 As the English Court of Appeal noted in its 2008 judgment in Research in Motion UK Ltd v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
The trial court ordered the parties to arbitration, appointed Judge Mark Davidson to arbitrate, and stayed the proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office is extended… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
"[J]udicial records, as well as documents reflecting out-of-court transactions such as mortgages, deeds, contracts, and any other papers, the contents of which are essentially undeniable, would qualify as documentary evidence in the proper case" (Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d at 84-85 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cives Corp. v George A. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
KG (IPKat) (Class 46) CFI: Frag Comercio Internacional, SL v OHIM, Tinkerbell Modas LTDA – Have you ever seen two less likely allegedly similar marks? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
– no ECJ referrals on trade mark cases (Class 46) Depreciation for registered trade marks only (Class 46) (IP finance) Krakow City seeks protection for Hejnał Mariacki as sound trade mark (Class 46) Are the shoemaker’s children always ill-shod? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am by Marie Louise
Hy-Grade Valve, Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Lack of intent to deceive warrants summary judgment of no false marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am by Brian A. Hall
Mont. 1993) (color green used on graphite fishing rods found to be functional); Russell Harrington Cutlery Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  How we deal with the free rider being the TM owner—Packman v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm by Marie Louise
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive:… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: European Court of Justice raises bar for famous brand owners wishing to prove dilution: Intel Corporation v CPM United Kingdom (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (IPKat) (Class 46) RPX Corporation – Defensive patent aggregation club (Securing Innovation) (Patent Fools) (Patent Prospector) (Techdirt) (IAM)… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
MARK SWINNEA, BRADY ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., AND MALMEBA COMPANY, LTD.; from Smith County;12th district (12? [read post]