Search for: "In Re All Asbestos Cases"
Results 161 - 180
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
The second case, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, 2012 U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:45 pm
IN RE ASBESTOS LITIGATION, JANINE McCOY and MARVIN McCOY Limited to: PolyVision Corp., Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County Turning, ultimately, on the peril of limitless liability the Delaware court in McCoy reasoned that Pennsylvania, which has yet to weigh in on the issue, would not find a duty to the spouse of an employee allegedly grievously injured as a result of being exposed to asbestos dust carried home on her husband's work clothes. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
All of those still living remain residents of Iraq. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:49 am
After all, as the California Supreme Court wrote, "Legal duties must be based on objective general predictions of the anticipated user population's knowledge, not case-by-case hindsight examinations of the particular plaintiff's subjective state of mind. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:35 am
Upon weighing the evidence in this case under these standards, the court finds plaintiff presented sufficient credible evidence that he worked with arc chutes manufactured and supplied by Cutler-Hammer; the arc chutes contained asbestos; asbestos fibers from the arc chutes were released during plaintiff’s work with them; and the levels of fibers released posed a hazard to plaintiff, and may have been a substantial factor in causing injury to him. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
That tunnel was found to have contained blue, brown and white asbestos, apparently from asbestos lagging around water pipes running through it. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit instructed Bankruptcy Court Judge Kaplan to dismiss LTL’s Chapter 11 petition saying it breached Bankruptcy Code section 1112(b)’s good-faith standard: “At base level, LTL, whose employees are all J&J employees, is essentially a shell company ‘formed,’ almost exclusively, ‘to manage and defend thousands of talc-related claims....'"Judge Kaplan officially dismissed the case that day. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:58 am
(And just in case you're wondering, we're pretty sure he's not the same William Baldwin who's Alec's brother, though he does seem to have an excellent head of hair). [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:22 am
To build a strong case, collecting all medical records including documents that track the exposure and provide a diagnosis is critical. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:59 pm
The case involved the allocation of loss for asbestos-related personal injury claims. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
One of the standing orders for those cases is that all documents have to be filed electronically. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:28 am
The case involved insurance for asbestos-related personal injury liability. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
While the test was endorsed by the Court of Appeal in both cases, it appears to sit uneasily not only with the established principle that “weighty reasons” are required to justify discrimination on “suspect grounds” (such as sex), but also with the recent Supreme Court decision in Re Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
Hoffmann at (314) 361-4300 or fill out our Online Case Evaluation Case! [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 1:52 pm
They tried a total of 29 civil cases, 18 by jury and 11 by bench trial. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am
Litig., MDL 1348, 441 F.Supp.2d 567 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)(“silent injury”) None of these other cases involved benzene, but they all involved speculative opinions. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 3:28 pm
The case involved a Washington man who worked in shipyards for much of his 20s, often working with and/or near materials that contained asbestos. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
His advocacy of a connection between asbestos and extrapulmonary cancers, his claim that all asbestos varieties were equivalent in potency for causing mesothelioma, and his risk assessments of total attributable asbestos risks are just some examples of where Selikoff outran his scientific headlights. [read post]
13 May 2009, 6:32 am
Hamburger's pattern of disregard of facts and theory mandate his rejection as an expert in all these cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
It's difficult to say an exact timeline for your case because it all depends on how hard the company or companies fight back, as well as the kind of compensation you are seeking. [read post]
