Search for: "In Re Application U-2"
Results 161 - 180
of 817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2013, 10:50 am
In re S.E.O., 873 F.Supp.2d 536, 546 (S.D.N.Y.2012). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:56 am
Volpe, 401 U. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
RE 38,551 and U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
She discussed the (in)famous R v Sharpe on CP offences vs freedom of expression, reading in exceptions re privately held material. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:54 pm
reçu d’invitation. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
There's no malice if you act in an (1) honest, and (2) reasonable mistake of fact regarding self-defense. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm
Co., 370 U. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
CSEA's action was neither barred by res judicata nor untimely:2. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
ARMY" Logo, Sustains 2(d) Refusal Precedential No. 28: "CLUB PALMS MVP" Confusingly Similar to "MVP" for Casino Services, TTAB Rules Precedential No. 27: Board Finds Family of "HOG" Marks, Sustains 2(d) Opposition to "DIRT HAWG" and "WATER HAWG" for Wet and Dry VacuumsSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: "EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB" Merely Descriptive of Real Estate Development Services, Says TTAB Addition of… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:35 am
Here are a portion: “On August 2, 2000, Cyber-Struct, Inc. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
Notwithstanding this precedent, Congress soon recodified §610’s corporate and union expenditure ban at 2 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:42 pm
Les rapports de recherches d'usage établis par une société tierce sont considérés comme un moyen de preuve approprié (arrêts du TF 4A_515/2017 du 4 juillet 2018 consid. 2.3.2 "Bentley" et 4A_299/2017 du 2 octobre 2017 consid. 4.1 "ABANKA [fig.] [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 2:46 am
As to blurring, the Board looked to the non-exclusive factors set out in Section 43(c)(2)(B). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
The panel discussion will feature Francisco Bencosme, U Kyaw Min and Olivia Enos. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm
Compare In re The Grand Jury Empaneling of the Special Grand Jury (3d Cir. 1999) (holding that the Free Exercise Clause didn’t allow a religiously motivated refusal to testify against a family member, at least in this case), and In re Doe (10th Cir. 1988) (same), with In re Greenberg, 11 Fed. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
In In re InterBank Funding Corp. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:00 am
” That sentence, however, is applicable to “Purchase Contracts and Contracts for Public Work if No Other Exception Applies” (emphasis added). [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:00 am
” That sentence, however, is applicable to “Purchase Contracts and Contracts for Public Work if No Other Exception Applies” (emphasis added). [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:03 pm
July 7, 2009)CLAIMED: “A computer aided method of managing a credit application. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:49 pm
Ferber, 458 U/S. 747, 769-71 (1982)). [9] Elster, slip. op. at 19. [10] Elster, slip op. at 20. [read post]
