Search for: "In Re Butts"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
On an issue that's spit the district courts in the Ninth Circuit, it holds that you're allowed to serve the defendants through their registered agent in the Trademark Office rather than going through the (total pain in the butt) Hague Convention.By contrast, if you're not one of those people, you might be at least marginally interested in footnote five of the opinion. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 4:45 am
While it’s not a mathematically precise test, I think you can see where we’re heading with this one. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:27 pm
Butts and Mr. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:27 pm
Butts and Mr. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:50 am
We’re taking a look at the black lawyers featured therein and making a few predictions of our own. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:54 am
” — uh – like “big black butt”? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 10:35 pm
Her super slick female investigator's response: "'It's not a conspiracy; you're good at it.' That's what my brother used to tell me to get me to do his chores. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:38 pm
And we're lucky to have anything, given that Sen. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:38 pm
And we're lucky to have anything, given that Sen. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
There have been no reports of illness and this is a Class III recall, meaning the product will not cause adverse health consequences.FSIS said the shipment of imported pork, inspected and passed by the Canadian authorities, arrived from Canada earlier than scheduled and and was sold to Lawson Foods without being presented to U.S. food safety authorities for re-inspection.The recall is for various weight cases of PORK SHOULDER BUTTS, with an identifying case code of 30312 and… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
After all, we’re practically ground zero for the foreclosure crisis, right? [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
Basically, to measure prevalence, Facebook takes a sample of content and then looks for how often the thing they're measuring—in this case, hate speech—gets seen as a percentage of viewed content. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:22 pm
You never know who has the balls to say what needs to be said until they're tested.Thankfully, someone in Colorado reads posts the practical blawgosphere, because the fine state has suddenly come to realize that they have a scoundrel in their midst. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:08 pm
If you’re a person who doesn’t particularly like sharing the road with bikers please be patient with them. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 4:27 am
You're not gonna check the trunk, are you? [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:21 am
Tonight is Halloween, so you're probably either out taking your kids to collect candy, or getting shitfaced. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 12:00 am
It's a nice time to reflect on what you're doing and where you're heading. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 3:43 am
You want to believe that you're only responsible for your "official" statements online, while twitting and blogging whatever idiocy you think is fun, cool or, in the case of some indiscriminate folks, trying to manipulate others to think you're the ginchiest guy on the internet. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 4:41 am
And once they get out, they’re put on supervised release or parole in state courts. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:29 am
Strangely, given that he has no role in criminal cases unless he's invited by local prosecutors (unless you consider his motives political, in which case it's not strange at all), Attorney General and gubernatorial candidate Greg Abbott sought to have the CCA re-hear the case. [read post]
